IRC IRC Insider

May 21, 2001

Email this page to a friend

Give us your feedback

International Relations Center

.

Letter from the Director

The IRC has been where the action is over the past several months, commenting in the international media about the spy plane incident, changes in U.S. "defense" strategy, U.S.-Mexico energy policy, and much more. We've also been on the front lines in the campaigns to block the nominations of rogues like Otto Reich, to change U.S. drug control policy, and to counter efforts to downsize key cross-border environmental programs established in the wake of NAFTA. As the Bush administration tries to move its "back to the past" agenda forward on trade, missile defense, and energy policy, the IRC will be there, causing trouble.

Debra Preusch

 

IRC Goings On

Fostering Strategic Dialog

As part of a new IRC focus, the staff and associates of both the U.S.-Mexico border program (BIOS) and the Global Affairs program are spending more time in promoting dialog among progressives on key issues such as U.S.-China policy, differences in policy recommendations among North-South NGOs, drug control policy, and Iraq policy. On the U.S.-Mexico border, a critical forum for dialog is the Annual Border Environment Meeting (Encuentro). BIOS director George Kourous, as a member of the Encuentro’s planning committee, played a central role in helping to organize a series of citizen roundtables feeding into a citizen’s agenda presented to U.S. and Mexican officials. John Gershman, codirector of our Global Affairs program, worked with the Friends Committee on National Legislation and the Asia Pacific Center for Justice and Peace to draft a Progressive Statement on U.S.-China relations, designed to counter China bashing and set a more constructive agenda for the progressive community. In June, the coalition will be circulating this statement to other organizations and church groups for their endorsements. Global Affairs’ Foreign Policy In Focus (FPIF) project is involved in a similar effort regarding U.S.-Iraq policy, and Stephen Zunes, FPIF’s Middle East editor, is drafting a consensus statement based on an FPIF-sponsored forum at the Institute for Policy Studies (IPS) in March. During the course of the next year, Stephen will be joining the IRC as a contract employee, working primarily on FPIF’s “Self-Determination and Governance” project.

In the Media

Both BIOS and FPIF were all over the media in the past couple of months. John Gershman spent a week answering press inquiries during the height of the spy plane incident. He was one of three commentators on the cable network MSNBC, bringing a voice of reason and progressive principles into the general atmosphere of China bashing. John was also one of four presenters at an FPIF-cosponsored press conference in May addressing the new militarization of U.S. defense strategy. Other speakers at this IPS-organized event were Lawrence Korb of the Council of Foreign Relations, Cindy Williams of MIT (and author of a new FPIF policy brief), and Bill Hartung of the World Policy Institute. John’s commentaries on the deterioration of U.S.-China relations have received close media attention in the Asia/Pacific region, being picked up by such important electronic news sources as China Online and accounting for a new surge of FPIF website visitors from the region.

Closer to home, the Albuquerque Tribune reprinted the borderlines UPDATER article on the serial murders of women workers in Ciudad Juárez, and the Diario de Juárez reprinted a borderlines article describing proposals to develop U.S.-Mexico energy connections. Our coverage of the Bush-Fox summit also received broad attention, being picked up, for example, by Político Magazine, a leading source of news and opinion targeted at Latino readers in the United States.

In the Policy Debate

On all fronts, even the tamest of liberal agendas are under attack. On the U.S.-Mexico border, the environmental mandate of the Border Environment Conservation Commission (BECC) may be taking a hit from forces in the U.S. and Mexico who believe that environmental protection and citizen involvement are getting in the way of bottom-line development. BIOS has joined with a number of NGOs to ensure that BECC and its important work in areas of infrastructure development, sustainability, and public participation are not undermined. Though far from ideal, BECC has proved open to citizen concerns—such as those recently presented by BIOS, which were then incorporated into BECC’s revised guidelines for public participation. BIOS, through a widely distributed survey, is demonstrating to government officials that attempts to downsize BECC will meet with strong and well-informed citizen opposition.

FPIF is part of a national coalition of groups organizing to block the nomination of Otto Reich as the State Department head of Western Hemisphere affairs. This right-wing Cuban American is just one of a rogues gallery of presidential appointments—all of whom are profiled in the Republican Rule section of the FPIF website. Tim McGivern, FPIF’s Outreach Director, has focused on raising awareness among youth and student constituencies about Reich’s nefarious operations—including his involvement with a group of sweatshop companies. Another area of strategic focus over the past couple of months is U.S. drug control policy, including the war in Colombia. We have brought together leading experts on the drug war for a new series of policy briefs and commentaries, which FPIF is circulating to the media, policymakers, and citizen groups.

Working with Constituencies

Both BIOS and FPIF provide concise and authoritative policy analysis that citizen groups can use in their own education and organizing—and we see signs of our success in just about every critical issue along the U.S.-Mexico border or in U.S. foreign policy. A recent issue of borderlines on energy policy provided key background information and analysis to a gathering of leading border actors involved in “Energy, Trade, and Environment” issues that was sponsored by the Southwest Center for Environmental Research and Policy in April. But not just activists appreciate borderlines and the borderlines UPDATER. “I love it. It’s very well researched, and I always read it the minute borderlines arrives,” said Maher Tadros, Advanced Concepts Group, Sandia National Laboratories, U.S. Dept. of Energy.

The IRC’s FPIF staff didn’t make it to the April protests and alternative summit in Quebec City, where the leaders of the hemisphere gathered to discuss the Free Trade Area of the Americas proposal. But our policy briefs and commentaries on the FTAA and the free trade agenda were widely distributed, including “Women and FTAA” by Marceline White (of Women’s Edge) and “FTAA” by Karen Hansen-Kuhn of Development GAP. Just name the leading global affairs issues of the past couple months—climate change treaty, U.S.-China relations, missile defense, Israel-Palestine tensions, etc.—and FPIF was there with timely commentary, research, and analysis. As part of a new IRC effort to reach out to students and youth, we have inaugurated our Student Activism In Focus webpage along with special direct and electronic efforts to involve students in our global affairs work. FPIF intern Jason Donato, who traveled to The Hague late last year for the UN-sponsored climate change talks, recently finished a documentary video on the contentious negotiations, with narration by Pulitzer Prize winning author (and FPIF expert) Ross Gelbspan. Back at home, Tim McGivern moderated a panel at the Lindesmith Center-Drug Policy Foundation conference on “Drug Policies for the New Millennium” in Albuquerque at the end of May.

Electronically, the IRC is reaching all over the world, and FPIF has experienced a surge in international visitors. Nabil Baradey wrote: “I have been reading and translating FPIF articles for a local Arab newspaper, and the reaction was really good. In general, your efforts have brought back to us some hope of a balanced U.S. policy in global affairs. They prove that, in the U.S., there are still people who hold to their principles and human responsibility. Thank you very much for all that.”

Office Contact Information

Albuquerque
Box 4506
Albuquerque, NM 87196-4506
Voice: (505) 842-8288
Fax: (505) 246-1601
Silver City
Box 2178
Silver City, NM 88062-2178
Voice: (505) 388-0208
Fax: (505) 388-0619
Email: irc@irc-online.org

 


Published by the International Relations Center (IRC, online at www.irc-online.org). Copyright © 2007, International Relations Center. All rights reserved.

Web location:
http://irc-online.org/content/inside/62

Production Information:
Author(s): IRC Staff - Silver City, NM
Production: Tonya Cannariato, IRC

 
PO Box 2178, Silver City, NM  88062-2178 | irc href="../../../default.htm" target="_parent" style="text-decoration:none"p;88062-2178 | irc@irc-online.org | (202) 536 2649 | www.irc-online.org

Copyright © 2007. All rights reserved.